Nutritional advice

Objectives:
Is there a relationship between nut consumption and metabolic syndrome (MetS)?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 11 observational studies (6 cross-sectional and 5 prospective cohort studies), which involved a total of 89,224 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found nut consumption significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 16% [overall multivariable adjusted RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.92, p  0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis tree nut consumption significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.94-1.00, p =0.04]. However, this reduced risk was not significant in peanuts [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.96-1.06, p = 0.68].

The investigators concluded nut consumption reduces risk of metabolic syndrome. However, this reduced risk is only found in tree nuts, not in peanuts. More well-designed studies with detailed specifications of nut varieties are needed to further elaborate the issues examined in this meta-analysis.

Original title:
Relationship Between Nut Consumption and Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Zhang Y and Zhang DZ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30716015

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and overweight right here.

Objectives:
Existing studies suggest that dietary vitamins and carotenoids might be associated with a reduced risk of age-related cataract (ARC), although a quantitative summary of these associations is lacking. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do vitamins and carotenoids intake reduce risk of the eye disease age-related cataract? 

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs and 12 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 19% [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.92, p = 0.001] of age-related cataract for dietary vitamin A intake.

The investigators found in cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 20% [RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.88, p 0.001] of age-related cataract for dietary vitamin C intake.

The investigators found in cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.00, p 0.049] of age-related cataract for dietary vitamin E intake.

The investigators found in cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.99, p = 0.023] of age-related cataract for dietary β-carotene intake.

The investigators found in cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 19% [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.89, p 0.001] of age-related cataract for dietary β lutein or zeaxanthin intake.

The investigators found in RCTs compared with the placebo, a non-significantly reduced risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.03, p 0.262] of age-related cataract for vitamin E supplementation.
Non-significantly because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.91 to 1.03. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in RCTs compared with the placebo, a non-significantly reduced risk of 1% [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.07, p 0.820] of age-related cataract for β-carotene supplementation.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis of cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 26% [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.80, p 0.001] of age-related cataract for every 10-mg/d increase in dietary lutein or zeaxanthin intake.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis of cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.91, p 0.001] of age-related cataract for every 500-mg/d increase in dietary vitamin C intake.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis of cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.96, p 0.001] of age-related cataract for every 5-mg/d increase in dietary β-carotene intake.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis of cohort studies a significantly reduced risk of 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.98, p 0.001] of age-related cataract for every 5 mg/d increase in dietary vitamin A intake.

The investigators concluded dietary intake of vitamin A (at least 5 mg per day), vitamin C (at least 500 mg per day), vitamin E, β-carotene (at least 5 mg per day) and lutein or zeaxanthin intake (at least 10 mg per day) reduce risk of age-related cataract.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin and carotenoid intake and risk of age-related cataract by Jiang H, Yin Y, […], Ma L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30624584

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on of vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, β-carotene and elderly right here.
 

Objectives:
The goal of this review article is to quantify the risk of P vivax parasitaemia after treatment of Plasmodium falciparum with commonly used antimalarial drugs to assess the potential benefits of radical cure for all patients with uncomplicated malaria in co-endemic regions.

Study design:
This review article included 153 studies with a total of 31,262 patients from 323 site-specific treatment groups (from 21 countries): 130 (85%) studies were from the Asia-Pacific region, 16 (10%) from the Americas and 7 (5%) from Africa.

Data for outcomes could be extracted from 106 studies for day 28, 58 studies for day 42 and 12 studies for day 63.

Studies were included if the presence or absence of P vivax parasitaemia was recorded after treatment.
The primary outcome was the risk of P vivax parasitaemia between day 7 and day 42 after initiation of antimalarial treatment for P falciparum, with the pooled risk calculated by random-effects meta-analysis.

There was substantial heterogeneity between study populations.
The mean or median age ranged from 2.9 years to 38.4 years.
Mean or median baseline parasitaemia ranged from 518 to 68 178 parasites per μL.
The prevalence of P falciparum gametocytes at baseline ranged from 0% to 52% and the mean or median baseline haemoglobin ranged from 7.8 g/dL to 14.3 g/dL.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of P vivax parasitaemia by day 42 was 5.6% [95% CI = 4.0-7.4, I2 = 92.0%, 117 estimates].

The investigators found the risk of P vivax parasitaemia was 6.5% [95% CI = 4.6-8.6] in regions of short relapse periodicity compared with 1.9% [95% CI = 0.4-4.0] in regions of long periodicity and was greater after treatment with a more rapidly eliminated ACT: 15.3% [95% CI = 5.1-29.3] for artemether-lumefantrine compared with 4.5% [95% CI = 1.2-9.3] for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and 5.2% [95% CI = 2.9-7.9] for artesunate-mefloquine.

The investigators found recurrent parasitaemia was delayed in patients treated with ACTs containing mefloquine or piperaquine compared with artemether-lumefantrine, but by day 63 the risk of vivax parasitaemia was more than 15% for all ACTs assessed.

The investigators concluded meta-analysis of 31,262 patients treated for falciparum malaria shows a high risk of subsequent P vivax parasitaemia across a range of co-endemic settings. P vivax parasitaemia occurred more frequently after treatment with rapidly eliminated drugs and in regions with short relapse periodicity. The risk was particularly apparent after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine [15.3% by day 42], accounting for more than half of all recurrent parasitaemias.
These findings suggest that in some regions co-endemic for both P falciparum and P vivax, the introduction of a universal policy of radical cure for all patients with uncomplicated malaria has potential to prevent recurrent parasitaemia, reduce ongoing transmission and enhance malaria elimination efforts.

Original title:
Risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after Plasmodium falciparum infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Commons RJ, Simpson JA, […], Price RN.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6300482/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on food fortification/malnutrition and malaria right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies focusing on the association between folate and breast cancer risk reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 23 prospective cohort studies involving 41,516 cases (=women with breast cancer) among 1,171,048 individuals.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary folate intake significantly reduced risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer with 12% [pooled risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-1.00].

The investigators found dietary folate intake significantly reduced risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer with 18% [pooled risk ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68-0.97].

The investigators found an increment of dietary folate intake of 100 μg per day was associated with a deceased risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-0.99].

The investigators found an increment of dietary folate intake of 100 μg per day was associated with a deceased risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer with 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97].

The investigators found high dietary folate intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk in premenopausal women with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-1.00].

The investigators found high dietary folate intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk in women with moderate or high levels of alcohol consumption with 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators concluded that at least 100 μg per day dietary folate intake, reduce both oestrogen-receptor-negative and oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer, particularly among premenopausal women and women with moderate or high levels of alcohol consumption.

Original title:
Folate intake and the risk of breast cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies by Zeng J, Wang K, [...], Chang H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647438

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on folate consumption, review article/significantly and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggests that viscous dietary fiber may offer beneficial effects on glycemic control and, thus, an improved cardiovascular disease risk profile. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does viscous dietary fiber supplementation improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 28 RCTs of ≥3 weeks in duration that assessed the effects of viscous fiber on markers of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes with a total of 1,394 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that viscous fiber at a median dose of ∼13.1 g/day significantly reduced HbA1c in type 2 diabetes [MD = -0.58%, 95% CI = -0.88 to -0.28, p = 0.0002] compared with control and in addition to standard of care.

The investigators found that viscous fiber at a median dose of ∼13.1 g/day significantly reduced fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes [MD = -0.82 mmol/L, 95% CI = -1.32 to -0.31, p = 0.001] compared with control and in addition to standard of care. 

The investigators found that viscous fiber at a median dose of ∼13.1 g/day significantly reduced HOMA-insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes [MD = -1.89, 95% CI = -3.45 to -0.33, p = 0.02] compared with control and in addition to standard of care.

The investigators found the certainty of evidence was graded moderate for HbA1c, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR and low for fructosamine.

The investigators concluded that 13.1 g/day viscous fiber supplements improve conventional markers of glycemic control beyond usual care and should be considered in the management of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Should Viscous Fiber Supplements Be Considered in Diabetes Control? Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Jovanovski E, Khayyat R, […], Vuksan V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617143

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and dietary fiber right here.

Objectives:
Is there an association between vitamin D and Parkinson's disease risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared with normal controls, 25-hydroxyvitamin D insufficiency (30 ng/mL) significantly increased risk of Parkinson's disease with 77% [OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.29 to 2.43, p 0.001].

The investigators found when compared with normal controls, 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency (20 ng/mL) significantly increased risk of Parkinson's disease with 155% [OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.98 to 3.27, p 0.001].

The investigators found 15 minutes/week sunlight exposure significantly decreased risk of Parkinson's disease with 98% [OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.10, p 0.001].

The investigators found the use of vitamin D supplements was effective in increasing 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels [SMD = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.18, p 0.001], but had no significant effect on motor function [MD = -1.82, 95% CI = -5.10 to 1.45, p = 0.275] in patients with Parkinson's disease.

The investigators concluded that insufficiency and deficiency of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D in blood) and reduced exposure to sunlight increase risk of Parkinson's disease. However, vitamin D supplements show no significant benefits in improving motor function for patients with Parkinson's disease.

Original title:
The Association Between Vitamin D Status, Vitamin D Supplementation, Sunlight Exposure, and Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Zhou Z, Zhou R, [...], Li K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30672512

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about vitamin D and chronic diseases.
 

Objectives:
Low fruit and vegetable intakes are recognized risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do fruit or vegetables intakes reduce noncommunicable diseases, likes cancer, coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality?

Study design:
This review article included 64 reports investigating 98 risk-disease pairs. 56 pairs from 39 reports were assessed as statistically significant, involving 29 burden of diseases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 44% [RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.74] for esophageal cancer.
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 28% [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.87] for mouth, pharynx and larynx cancer.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.88] for stroke.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.90] for all-cause mortality.

The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.95] for renal cell cancer.

The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.95] for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.89] for coronary heart disease.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 13% [RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.90] for all-cause mortality.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis clear increases in protective associations were observed with the first 200 g/day of fruit or vegetable intakes, whereas little further increase or even decrease in protective associations were reported beyond 300 g/day intakes.

The investigators found canned fruit intakes were positively associated with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality.

The investigators found pickled vegetable intakes were positively associated with stomach cancer.

The investigators concluded that 100-300 g/day of fruit or vegetables intakes reduce certain cancers, coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality. These findings support existing recommendations for fruit and vegetable intakes. Current comparative risk assessments might significantly underestimate the protective associations of fruit and vegetable intakes.

Original title:
The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes with Burden of Diseases: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses by Yip CSC, Chan W and Fielding R.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30639206

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and vegetable consumption, coronary heart disease and cancer right here.