Nutritional advice

Objectives:
With only 5-10% of breast cancer cases attributed to genetic inheritance, prevention efforts have focused on modifiable risk factors. Physical activity plays a role in reducing breast cancer risk; however, the interaction between physical activity and other modifiable risk factors, such as obesity, has received little attention. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

What is the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer and how it may be modified by body mass index (BMI)?

Study design:
This review article included 18 cohort and 11 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, a significant reduction of 15% for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with a BMI 25 kg/m² for high versus low levels of physical activity [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92]. 

The investigators found overall, a significant reduction of 13% for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² for high versus low levels of physical activity for women [RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.81-0.93]. 

The investigators found overall, a non-significant reduction of 7% for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with a BMI ≥30 kg/m² for high versus low levels of physical activity for women [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.76-1.13]. 

The investigators found, however, physical activity was not associated with a significant reduction in risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women in any BMI group.

The investigators concluded high levels of physical activity reduce risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with a BMI until 30. Since the included studies used diverse methods for assessment of physical activity and categories of BMI, results should be interpreted with caution and additional work is needed.

Original title:
Does obesity modify the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer risk? by Neil-Sztramko SE, Boyle T, […], Campbell KL.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28803384

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on breast cancer, BMI and physical activity right here.

Objectives:
In the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Second Expert Report, the expert panel judged that there was strong evidence that alcoholic drinks and body fatness increased esophageal cancer risk, whereas fruits and vegetables probably decreased its risk. The judgments were mainly based on case-control studies. As part of the Continuous Update Project (CUP), this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

What is the relationship between nutrition and esophageal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 57 cohort studies, used in previous 13 meta-analyses.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 11% for esophageal adenocarcinoma for every increment of 100g/day vegetable intake [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 47% for esophageal adenocarcinoma for every 5 unit increment in BMI [RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.34-1.61, n = 9].

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 16% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 100g/day fruit intake [RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.94, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 36% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every 5 unit increment in BMI [RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.56-0.73, n = 8].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 59% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 50g/day processed meat intake [RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.11-2.28, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 37% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 100g/day processed and red meat intake [RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04-1.82, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 25% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 10g/day alcohol intake [RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.12-1.41, n = 6].

The investigators concluded evidence from cohort studies shows a protective role of vegetables and body weight control in esophageal adenocarcinomas development. For squamous cell carcinomas, higher intakes of red and processed meats and alcohol increase the risk, whereas fruits intake has a protective role.

Original title:
An update of the WCRF/AICR systematic literature review and meta-analysis on dietary and anthropometric factors and esophageal cancer risk by Vingeliene S, Chan DSM, […], Norat T.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666313

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetable, fruit, alcohol and meat consumption, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
The relationship between intake of fish and n-3 fatty acids and endometrial cancer risk has not been consistent across epidemiological studies. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do fish consumption and dietary EPA and DHA intake reduce endometrial cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 4 prospective cohort studies, 1 case-cohort study and 11 case-control studies (including 8 population-based case-control studies and 3 hospital-based case-control studies).
The prospective cohort studies had a mean follow-up of 6.5 to 9.1 years.
The highest category of fish ranged from >1-2 servings/week to >15.4 servings/week,
The highest category of DHA ranged from 143 to 227 mg/d.
The highest category of EPA ranged from 74.7 to 127 mg/d.

When fish intake was reported in unit of g/d, it was converted to serving/week by assuming 1 serving = 100g.
Overall, all 16 studies were classified as high-quality studies.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a non-significant association between the highest vs. lowest category of fish consumption and endometrial cancer risk [RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84-1.30, I2 = 80.4%].
According to the subgroup analyses, the null association persisted in strata according to study design, location, type of controls, number of cases, publication year and adjustments of energy intake, reproductive factors and smoking.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant reduced risk of 10% for endometrial cancer in studies conducted in Europe [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.97]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant increased risk of 15% for endometrial cancer in studies conducted in Asia [RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10-1.21]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.10 to 1.21. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in studies adjusting for smoking for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant reduced risk of 5% for endometrial cancer [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-1.00].

The investigators found in studies without an adjustment of smoking for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant increased risk of 14% for endometrial cancer [RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09-1.19].

The investigators found a non-significant inverse association between the highest category of DHA intake and endometrial cancer risk [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.64-1.11, I2 = 59.6%]. However, the dose-response analysis suggested a significant non-linear relationship between DHA intake and endometrial cancer risk [p = 0.04 and p for heterogeneity = 0.39], with a decreased risk being detected for an intake of DHA no more than 175 mg/d.

The investigators concluded that there is a significant inverse association between every one additional serving/week of fish intake and endometrial cancer risk in studies conducted in Europe and studies adjusted for smoking. Furthermore, there is a significant non-linear relationship between DHA intake and risk of endometrial cancer, with a decreased risk being detected for an intake of DHA no more than 175 mg/d. Further well-designed studies are warranted to better characterize the relationship between fish, n-3 PUFA and endometrial cancer development.

Original title:
Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, fish consumption, and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies by Hou R, Yao SS, […], Jiang L.

Link:
http://www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/index.php?journal=oncotarget&page=article&op=view&path[]=18295&path[]=58664

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish consumption, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.
These fish contain 175 mg DHA.
 

Objectives:
Although several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between dietary calcium intake and the risk of esophageal cancer, the results are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary calcium intake reduce risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 3 cohort studies and 14 case-control studies, including 3,396 cases (subjects with esophageal cancer) and 346,815 controls (subjects without esophageal cancer).

Egger’s test showed no evidence of significant publication bias.

The sample size was large enough to evaluate the effect of calcium intake on esophageal cancer.

A dose-response effect analysis could not be performed due to the incomplete data of dietary calcium intake.

The average of highest dietary calcium intake in Asian populations was 621 mg/day.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for highest vs. lowest dietary calcium intake a significant reduced risk of 20% for esophageal cancer [pooled OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71-0.91, I2 = 33.6%].
This significant reduced risk was also found in studies conducted in Asia [OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.86, I2 = 0.0%], studies published after 2000 [OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.53-0.77, I2 = 0.0%), studies adjusted for dietary energy intake [OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98, I2 = 3.6%], studies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96, I2 = 28.3%], cohort studies [OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.54-0.84, I2 = 23.6%] and studies with high quality score [OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66-0.87, I2 = 12.7%].

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis (conducted by leaving one study out in turn and pooling the ORs of the remaining studies) the summary ORs did not substantially change, which indicated that the results were statistically robust.

The investigators concluded that a higher intake (621 mg/day) of dietary calcium has protective effect against esophageal cancer - especially esophageal squamous cell cancer - in Asian populations. To further solidify the association of dietary calcium intake with the risk of esophageal cancer, well-designed studies - especially prospective cohort studies with validated FFQ and adjusted for dietary energy intake - should be conducted.

Original title:
Protective Effect of Dietary Calcium Intake on Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Li Q, Cui, L, […], Wang L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5452240/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does cruciferous vegetable intake decrease colon cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 articles.
Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, cruciferous vegetable intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 16% [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, p value heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, broccoli intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.99, p value heterogeneity = 0.02].

The investigators found stratification by GST genotype showed that the GSTT1 null genotype confered a reduction in colorectal neoplasms risk of 22% [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95, p value heterogeneity = 0.32].

The investigators concluded this meta-analysis provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This meta-analysis also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Original title:
Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Tse G and Eslick GD.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341734

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on colon cancer and cruciferous vegetable intake right here.

Objectives:
Does physical activity reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies (with mean reported follow-up ranging from 6 to 18.8 years) and 9 case control studies reporting 11,111 cases of gastric cancer among 1,606,760 patients.

There was no evidence of publication bias, both quantitatively [Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test, p = 0.62] and qualitatively, on visual inspection of the funnel plot.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of gastric cancer was 21% [OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.87, I2 = 55%]  lower among the most physically active people as compared with the least physically active people, after adjustment for important confounders, including age, obesity, and other risk factors for gastric cancer (smoking, alcohol, dietary patterns and socioeconomic status).
This protective effect was seen for gastric cancers in the cardia [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63-1.00, 4 studies] and distal stomach [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.76, 5 studies].

The investigators found increasing physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer in both men [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 10 studies] and women [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, 3 studies].

The investigators found in 12 studies that increased recreational physical activity showed an 18% reduction in gastric cancer risk [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators found the effect size was significantly smaller in high-quality studies [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 6 studies] as compared with low-quality studies [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.81, 10 studies]. The results were consistent across sex, study quality, study design and geographic location.

The investigators concluded physical activity - especially recreational physical activity - is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer. Lifestyle interventions focusing on increasing physical activity may decrease the global burden of gastric cancer, in addition to a myriad of other health benefits with being physically active, which include cardiovascular, metabolic and psychologic wellbeing.

Original title:
Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Singh S, Varayil JE, […], Iyer PG.

Link:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/7/1/12.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and cancer right here.

Objectives:
There have been inconsistent results about the association between consumption of fruits and vegetables and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does consumption of fruits and vegetables reduce renal cell carcinoma risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 observational studies (4 cohort, 1 pooled and 14 case-control studies), involving 10,215 subjects with renal cell carcinoma.

Only 4 studies adjusted for all the 3 main risk factors for renal cell carcinoma (16 studies adjusted for tobacco smoking, 15 for BMI and 4 for hypertension).
The majority of included studies (16/19) were of high quality (NOS score ≥ 7).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for highest vs. lowest vegetables intake a significant reduced risk of 27% for renal cell carcinoma [SRR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.63-0.85, I2 = 53.5%, p = 0.004]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest vegetables intake a non-significant reduced risk of 13% for renal cell carcinoma in cohort studies [SRR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.72-1.06].

The investigators found in dose-response analysis a significant reduced risk of 10% for renal cell carcinoma per 1 serving/day vegetables intake [SRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.96, I2 = 69.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found a non-linear association between vegetable intake and renal cell carcinoma risk [p = 0.001 for non-linearity] with a significant reduction in renal cell carcinoma risk when increasing the intake up to about 3 servings/d intake of vegetables. Higher intake was associated with a further, but more modest decrease in risk.

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest fruits intake a significant reduced risk of 14% for renal cell carcinoma [SRR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.98, I2 = 47.4%, p = 0.012].

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest fruits intake a significant reduced risk of 28% for renal cell carcinoma among European [SRR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.93]. However, this reduced risk was not significant among North Americans [SRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.81-1.16].

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest fruits intake a significant reduced risk of 22% for renal cell carcinoma in population-based case-control studies [SRR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97]. However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [SRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.73-1.10] and in hospital-based case-control studies [SRR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.69-1.33].

The investigators found in dose-response analysis no associaition between 1 serving/day increment of fruits and renal cell carcinoma risk [SRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93-1.01, I2 = 57.8%, p = 0.011].

The investigators found a linear association between fruits intake and renal cell carcinoma risk [p = 0.221 for non-linearity].

The investigators concluded that consumption of 1-3 servings/d vegetables and high fruits may lower the risk of renal cell carcinoma development. May lower, because significant associations for vegetables and fruits were only observed in case-control, but not in cohort studies. Because of the measurement errors of exposure assessment, the high heterogeneity across studies and unmeasured confounding factors, further investigation with good designs are needed.

Original title:
Consumption of fruits and vegetables and risk of renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang S, Jia Z, [...], Yang J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438616/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and fruits consumption, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high red meat consumption increase stomach cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 18 studies (cohort and case-control studies) involving 1,228,327 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake a significant increased risk of 37% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.59, I2 = 67.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in population-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 58% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.06, I2 = 73.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in hospital-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 63% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38-1.92, I2 = 19.1%, p = 0.284].

The investigators found, however, no association among cohort studies [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.83-1.20, I2 = 33.9%, p = 0.158].

The investigators found the significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (≥2000), sample size (1,000, ≥1,000) and quality score (7 stars, ≥7 stars).

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake significant increased gastric cancer risk with 17% [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.32].

The investigators found in linear regression model that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption.

The investigators concluded that a increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Might be because the risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to verify this association.

Original title:
Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis by Song P, Lu M, […], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat intake and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Does allium vegetable consumption reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 22 case-control and 4 cohort studies with more than 10,000 cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 10 case-control and 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a significant reduced risk of 22% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91].

The investigators found in 12 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest garlic intake category a significant reduced risk of 40% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.76].

The investigators found in 13 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest onion intake category a significant reduced risk of 45% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73].

The investigators found in 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a non-significant increased risk of 2% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.88-1.18]. Non-significant means no association with 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded high allium vegetable consumption, like garlic and onion is likely to reduce gastric cancer risk. Likely because this evidence is derived mainly from case-control studies. Therefore, further data from large cohorts are desirable for conclusive confirmation.

Original title:
Allium vegetable intake and gastric cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis by Turati F, Pelucchi C, […], Galeone C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25215621

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on allium vegetable consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Previous studies regarding the relationship between legume intake and risk of prostate cancer have reported inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does legume intake reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 prospective cohort studies reporting 281,034 individuals and 10,234 incident prostate cancer cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing high consumption of legumes with low consumption a significant reduced risk of 15% [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75-0.96, p = 0.010, I2 = 45.8%] for prostate cancer.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis indicated that the risk of prostate cancer reduced by 3.7% [95% CI = 1.5%-5.8%] for each 20 grams per day increment of legume intake.

The investigators concluded that a high dietary intake of legumes, at least 20 grams per day is associated with a low incidence of prostate cancer.

Original title:
Legume intake and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Li J and Mao QQ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28423366

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most common malignancy of the endocrine system. The relationship between iodine intake and thyroid cancer risk is controversial always. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of iodine reduce thyroid cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control studies with in total 2213 subjects with thyroid cancer and 2761 subjects without thyroid cancer.

With regard to publication bias, owing to the limited number (below 10) of studies included in the saltwater fish, shellfish and iodine intake analyses, publication bias was not assessed.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found adequate or excess iodine dietary intake (>300 μg/d) significantly decreased the risk of thyroid cancer with 26% [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60-0.92].

The investigators found high consumption of saltwater fish (≥3 times/wk or ≥12 times/mo) significantly decreased the risk of thyroid cancer with 28% [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02].

The investigators found high consumption of shellfish (≥3 times/wk or ≥12 times/mo) significantly decreased the risk of thyroid cancer with 30% [OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52-0.96, p = 0.03].

The investigators concluded a higher intake of dietary iodine (>300 μg/d) may decrease the risk of thyroid cancer in populations mainly based in coastal cities or on islands. May decrease, because this review article did not include cohort  studies.

Original title:
The relationship between iodine intake and the risk of thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis by Cao LZ, Peng XD, [...], Li S.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440127/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iodine and fish consumption, meta-analysis/cohort studies and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Many epidemiological studies have investigated the association between prostate cancer and lycopene, however, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does lycopene reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 42 studies including 43,851 cases of prostate cancer reported from 692,012 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary intake of lycopene was significantly associated with a reduced prostate cancer risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-0.98, p = 0.017].

The investigators found circulating concentrations of lycopene were significantly associated with a reduced prostate cancer risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.98, p = 0.019].

The investigators found sensitivity analyses within the dose-response analysis further revealed a significant linear dose-response for dietary lycopene and prostate cancer risk such that prostate cancer decreased by 1% for every additional 2 mg of lycopene consumed [p = 0.026].

The investigators found prostate cancer risk decreased by 3.5 to 3.6% for each additional 10 μg/dL of circulating lycopene in the linear and nonlinear models, respectively [p-linear = 0.004, p-non linear = 0.006].

The investigators found no association between lycopene and advanced prostate cancer. However, there was a trend for protection against prostate cancer aggressiveness [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-1.00, p = 0.052].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary and circulating lycopene concentrations reduce prostate cancer risk. This was accompanied by dose-response relationships for dietary and circulating lycopene. Further studies are required to determine the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Original title:
Increased dietary and circulating lycopene are associated with reduced prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Rowles JL, Ranard KM, […], Erdman JW Jr.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28440323

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on lycopene consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
There are conflicting reports on the correlation between manganese (Mn) levels and breast cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does manganese deficiency increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 case-control studies involving 1302 subjects.

There was no evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed that excluding any one study from the pooled analysis did not vary the results substantially.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the random-effects meta-analysis results indicated that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels in serum and hair than healthy controls [SMD = -1.51, 95% CI = -2.47 to -0.56, I2 = 97.8%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels than healthy controls in China [SMD = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.33 to -0.32] and Korea [SMD = -4.08, 95% CI = -4.63 to -3.54], but not in Turkey [SMD = -0.96, 95% CI = -3.19 to 1.27].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the differences of manganese levels between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls were similar in different sample specimens:
serum [SMD = -1.24, 95% CI = -2.31 to -0.16];
hair [SMD = -1.99, 95% CI = -3.91 to -0.06] and;
different types of manganese measurement:

ICP-AAS [SMD = -1.14, 95% CI = -2.24 to -0.04];
GFAAS [SMD = -1.94, 95% CI = -2.38 to -1.49];
ICP-AES [SMD = -3.77, 95% CI = -4.70 to -2.85]. These findings can well explain that  the between-study variability was the main source of heterogeneity.

The investigators concluded there is an association between deficient manganese concentration and breast cancer. However, the subgroup analysis found that there was contradiction regarding races and geography, like China and Turkey. Thus this finding needs further confirmation by trans-regional multicenter, long-term observation in a cohort design to obtain better understanding of causal relationships between manganese levels and breast cancer, through measuring manganese at baseline to investigate whether the highest manganese category versus lowest was associated with breast cancer risk.

Original title:
The association between deficient manganese levels and breast cancer: a meta-analysis by Shen F, Cai WS, [...],Xu B.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443096/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on manganese and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Quantification of the association between the intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial even though several studies have explored this association. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high intake of vegetables and fruit decrease risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 32 observational studies involving 10037 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest vs. lowest vegetable intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 44% [SRR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.69, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found highest vs. lowest fruit intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 47% [SRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.44-0.64, p-heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found similar results in a linear dose-response analysis and there was evidence of non-linear associations for intakes of fruit [p non-linearity 0.001] and vegetables [p non-linearity = 0.041].

The investigators concluded that intakes of vegetables and fruit reduce risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation with prospective designs, validated questionnaires and good control of important confounders is warranted.

Original title:
Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies by Liu J, Wang J, […], Lv C.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319052

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on review, 95% CI and heterogeneity, vegetables and fruits and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Prostate cancer (PCa) now remains the 2nd most frequently diagnosed cancer. In recent years, chemoprevention for prostate cancer becomes a possible concept. Especially, many phytochemicals rich foods are suggested to lower the risk of cancer. Among these foods, green tea is considered as effective prevention for various cancers. However, clinical trials and previous meta-analyses on the relationship between green tea consumption and the risk of prostate cancer have produced inconsistent outcomes. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does green tea intake reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies and 3 RCTs. The cohort studies and case-control studies which investigated the association between green tea intake and prostate cancer risk included 1435 cases among 96,332 individuals and the 3 RCTs studied the relationship between EGCG and prostate cancer incidence included 87 volunteers in EGCG arms of 179 individuals.

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in observational studies (4 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies) for the highest versus lowest category of green tea intake a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.77-1.11, I2 = 0%, p = 0.46] for all studies;

a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 2.3% [RR = 0.977, 95% CI = 0.80-1.19] for cohort studies and;
a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 27.7% [RR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0,368-1.056, I2  = 0%, p =  0.46] for case-control studies.

The investigators found no association between 1-5 cups of green tea per day and prostate cancer risk.

However, the investigators found 7 cups of green tea per day significantly reduced prostate cancer risk with 19% [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97]. The significant reduced prostate cancer risk increased to 26% [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.93] for 9 cups and to 44% [RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92) for 15 cups.

The investigators found in 3 RCTs when compared to placebo green tea catechins significantly reduced prostate cancer risk  with 62% [RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.86, p  =  0.02].

The investigators concluded that at least 7 cups/day green tea intake reduces prostate cancer. This is further confirmed by the potential protective effect of green tea catechins on prostate cancer. Further prospective study with accurate measurement of green tea intake is required to substantiate these conclusions.

Original title:
Green tea and the risk of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Guo Y, Zhi F, […], Zhang X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380255/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on green tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies assessing the relationship between dietary vitamin B2 and the risk of breast cancer have produced inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary vitamin B2 intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 epidemiologic studies (cohort or patient-controle studies) comprising totally 12,268 breast cancer patients.

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found comparing the highest to the lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake a significant reduced risk of 15% for breast cancer [pooled relative risk = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.95, I2 = 40.7%].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that an increment of 1 mg/day dietary vitamin B2 intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer with 6% [relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.99].

The investigators concluded that dietary vitamin B2 intake, at least 1 mg/day, is related to the reduced risk of breast cancer. However, additional research is also necessary to further explore this association.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin B2 intake and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Yu L, Tan Y and Zhu L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035488

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin B2 and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Is there an association of intake of different vitamins and multiple-vitamin supplements and the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 47 articles (cohort studies).

There was unacceptable heterogeneity for studies of multiple-vitamin supplements, so findings were inconclusive.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B9 (folate) intake. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 13% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin D intake. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.77 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B6 intake.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 14% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76-0.97] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake.

The investigators found, however, no association between both dietary vitamine A, C, E, B3 and B12 and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The investigators concluded high dietary vitamin B9 (folate), D, B6 and B2 intake reduces risk of colorectal cancer, but further study is needed.

Original title:
Vitamin and multiple-vitamin supplement intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies by Liu Y, Yu Q, […], Li K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491145

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on vitamines and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Red meat intake has been associated with risk of colorectal cancer, potentially mediated through heterocyclic amines. The metabolic efficiency of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) required for the metabolic activation of such amines is influenced by genetic variation. The interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer has been inconsistently reported. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 retrospective case-control studies with 8,290 colorectal cancer cases and 9,115 controls (subjects without colorectal cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest quartile of red meat intake was associated with a 41% increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with the lowest quartile [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.29-1.55].
However, a significant association was observed only for studies with retrospective diet data, not for studies with diet prospectively assessed before cancer diagnosis.

The investigators found when combining all studies, high red meat intake was similarly associated with colorectal cancer in those with a rapid/intermediate NAT2 genotype [OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.20-1.59] as with a slow genotype [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.28-1.61, p interaction = 0.9].

The investigators concluded high red meat intake was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer only from retrospective case-control studies and not modified by NAT2 enzyme activity.

Original title:
Red Meat Intake, NAT2, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Studies by Ananthakrishnan AN, Du M, […], Chan AT.

Link:
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/cebp/24/1/198.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on red meat consumption and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
The association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk remains controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary carbohydrate intake increase colorectal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-controle studies en 9 prospective cohort studies involving 14,402 colorectal cancer patients among 846004 participants; 17 studies with 9,235 cases were to assess the association on colon cancer and 13  studies with 3,272 cases were to  assess the association on rectum cancer. 

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.93-1.23, I2 = 68.3%, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.23. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colon cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.95-1.25, I2 = 48.3%].

The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and rectum cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98-1.39, I2 = 17.8%].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for study design, a non-significant association for both case-control studies [summary RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93-2.09] and cohort studies [summary RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.85-1.15].  

The investigators found in stratified analysis by geographic locations, higher dietary   carbohydrate intake had no significant association on colorectal cancer risk among American populations [summary RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.89-1.30], European populations [summary RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.91-1.64] or Asian population [summary RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.65-1.46].

The investigators found higher dietary carbohydrate intake significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer with 23% in men populations [summary RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.57], but not in women populations.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary carbohydrate intake increases colorectal cancer risk in men populations. Further studies are wanted to confirm this relationship.

Original title:
A meta-analysis between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk: Evidence from 17 observational studies by Huang J, Pan G, [...], Zhu Z.

Link:
http://www.bioscirep.org/content/ppbioscirep/early/2017/03/15/BSR20160553.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and colorectal cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
There is no published systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effect of olive oil consumption on cancer occurrence. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 case-control studies (13800 cancer patients and 23340 controls).

Random effects meta-analysis was applied in order to evaluate the research hypothesis.
Heterogeneity of the effect-size measures was observed in studies performed in the Mediterranean region (n = 15, p = 0.0002), whereas no heterogeneity was observed in non-Mediterranean studies (n = 4, p = 0.12).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing with the lowest, the highest category of olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of having any type of cancer [log odds ratio = -0.41, 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.29, Cohran's Q = 47.52, p = 0.0002, I2 = 62%].

The investigators found both Mediterranean and non-Mediterranean people reported olive oil intake were less likely to have developed any type of cancer.

The investigators found olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of developing breast cancer [logOR = -0.4,  95% CI = -0.78 to -0.12] and a cancer of the digestive system [logOR = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.21] compared with the lowest intake.

The investigators concluded olive oil consumption probably reduces risk of any type of cancer, especially breast cancer and cancer of the digestive system. Probably, because this review article only included case-control studies and there was heterogeneity.
The reduced risk is similar to studies performed in Mediterranean as well as non-Mediterranean countries. However, it is still unclear whether olive oil's monounsaturated fatty acid content or its antioxidant components are responsible for its beneficial effects.

Original title:
Olive oil intake is inversely related to cancer prevalence: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 13800 patients and 23340 controls in 19 observational studies by Psaltopoulou T, Kosti RI, […], Panagiotakos DB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199852/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies on olive oil consumption and fat.

Objectives:
Many studies suggest that high-fat diets are linked to the etiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, the findings are inconsistent and therefore the association between fat and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma remains unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high fat dietary intake increase non-Hodgkin's lymphoma risk?

Study design:
This review article included two cohort studies and eight case-control studies.

The funnel plot revealed no evidence for publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant higher risk of 26% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma for total fat consumption [RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.12-1.42]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.12 to 1.42. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed a significant higher risk of 41% for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for total fat consumption [RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.08-1.84]. However, there was no significant association between total fat consumption and increase risk of follicular lymphoma [RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.97-1.52], small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.68-1.23] nor with T cell lymphoma [RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.60-2.09].
No significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.60 to 2.09. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that total fat consumption increases non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; especially diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Consumption and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Risk: A Meta-analysis by Han TJ, Li JS, [...], Xu HZ.

Link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094569

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat and cancer right here.

Lymphoma is the most common blood cancer. The two main forms of lymphoma are Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The human body has two main types of lymphocytes that can develop into lymphomas:

1. B lymphocytes (B cells) and;
2. T lymphocytes (T cells).

B-cell lymphomas are much more common than T-cell lymphomas and account for approximately 85 percent of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are the commonest subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. They constitute about 30 to 40% of adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A high total fat consumption corresponds to a diet with >35 En% fat and/or >10 En% saturated fat. A diet with >35 En% fat is a diet with a lot of products/meals providing >35 En% fat.
 

Objectives:
Several epidemiological studies investigating the association between dietary vitamin E intake and the risk of lung cancer have demonstrated inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary vitamin E intake reduce lung cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 9 cohort studies with 4,164 lung cancer cases among 435,532 participants.

The Egger’s test showed no evidence of publication bias [t = 1.24, p = 0.246].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of dietary vitamin E intake a reduced risk of 16% for lung cancer [pooled RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.93, I2 = 41.1%].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis by geographic location a significant inverse association of dietary vitamin E intake with lung cancer for the European and American populations [pooled RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75-0.95), but not for the Asian population. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found every 2 mg/d increase in dietary vitamin E intake statistically decreased the risk of lung cancer by 5% [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99, p linearity = 0.0237].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary vitamin E intake; at least 2 mg per day exerts a protective effect against lung cancer.

Original title:
Association of dietary vitamin E intake with risk of lung cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis by Zhu YJ, Bo YC, [...], Qiu CG.

Link:
http://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/26/2/271.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin E and cancer right here.